![]() ![]() Others are trying to put the user closer to the database with wikis and record linking features. Some do this miserably with “tag only” systems that delude into piles of information. Moving away from rigid top down structures (not how we think), apps are trying to find UXs that represent many-to-many bottom-up lookups on the back end. One suggestion from my side, depending on the roadmap, that will help to keep competitive. This is apparent in bugs, assuming they exist, being made transparent. Developers are very committed to smooth experience. It’s odd that’s support does not respond or address any of these reviews with comments or reply ![]() Unhappy disappointed customer Why can’t you start with a blank mind map with just a central Topic as a starting point? You have to pick from template then delete or fill in. Just type in mind-mapping in the apple store. Unless this is fixed I will be forced to cancel my subscription and stay with competing mindmapping and nowadays there ar plenty good ones. XMind stopped at 7 and only have 1-7 why? It is the easy programming fix add 0,8,9 only 3 additional markers so we, the end users can number priority's beyond 7 I send screen shots from a competitive mind map that I seem to Gravitate to because of the numbering. With 0 to 9 you can add Infinite numbers. However nothing has been done in over 9 months and they are forcing me away from XMind to competitive mind mapping which all them seem to have numbers 0 to 9, so when you want a to number branches of past 7, you can. I suggested a simple solution several times and they always replied that they would considerate and add in a future upgrade. I believe this will make the mind maps not only more organized, but also more efficient in terms of use and space! I hope these suggestions reach you! If it does, please let me know if you believe this is a suggestion you feel is beneficial?Sincerely, A fan of XMind For students like me using the xmind, I would like to define “Cat”, “Ecology”, and “Tundra” without adding it into the box (For organizational and aesthetic reasons) instead, what I suggest is that there should be a function where I can define the word “Cat”, and while the box just sais the word “Cat”, the definition can show up only when I click on that individual box. For example, Cat (Main topic) -Ecology (Subtopic 1) -Tundra (Subtopic 1a). It would be really nice to have a function where I could tap on a box and see additional information regarding that box. Regarding the topic of this text, I have a suggestion to improve the app. I will definitely change it to 5 stars if hopefully I get a response. Dear XMind Devs,I am only rating this with two stars to hopefully obtain your attention. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |